Marriage of Crane
(C041904, C042783, unpublished 2004). Mr. Sargeant represented the husband in his appeal from a marital dissolution judgment. The Third District agreed with Mr. Sargeant's argument that the trial court erred in assigning the entire debt from the parties' line of credit to husband, while assigning to wife the smaller indebtedness represented by a credit card debt. The appellate court also agreed that the trial court erred in awarding to the wife reimbursement for funds spent to improve the husband's separate property because there was no evidence that those funds were community property.
